Research and analysis: Women in ground close combat roles review 2016

In 2014 the current Secretary of State for Defence welcomed the prospect of opening ground close combat (GCC) roles to women, which was reinforced by the Prime Minister in December 2015. However the Secretary of State noted that lifting the exclusion without conducting further research to understand the risks to servicewomen’s health could expose women to unnecessary risk. He directed research to understand the physical challenges and potential health risks to women in GCC roles. This work was to produce an interim health report in early 2016 to inform a final decision on lifting exclusions by mid 2016.

from Ministry of Defence – Activity on GOV.UK http://ift.tt/29rmdQY

 

 

Science Fiction Soldiers

Watch any science fiction film and the soldiers always seem to have a heads up display where information is fused seamlessly and presented to the wearer.

Whilst science and technology marches on at a relentless pace, the current state of the art seems, at least in virtual or synthetic environments, somewhat clunky.

 

The Google Glass type display that projects symbology onto a normal pair of glasses seems the most likely to be adopted first but one of the difficulties, apart from all the usual power, weight and what exactly would be displayed issues, is combining protective glass with a lightweight projector.

 

A recent announcement from a Finnish company, VTT, may be important on the road to Sci Fi Soldiers.

The technology is based on lightguide optics, which enables the manufacture of displays on either glass or plastic in the form of light and thin elements with a thickness of just one millimetre. In addition to thinness, the benefits of the technology include a large, high-quality virtual image and excellent transparency. The display element can also be freely shaped.

“Compared to existing solutions, which are bulky or difficult to manufacture, the Dispelix solution has advantages such as the display’s thinness, lightness, aesthetic appearance and volume production compatibility,” says Sunnari.

The display’s user-friendliness is boosted by the fact that the virtual image forms within the user’s field of vision, which prevents eye strain. Dispelix’s display solution can be customised to meet different customer needs – depending on the application, either simple, monochrome information or a multi-coloured video image can be displayed within the user’s field of vision.

“The size of the virtual image is equivalent to a 60-inch TV viewed from a distance of three metres,” Sunnari explains.

Interesting stuff.

 

One day…

 

 

Ropes and ladders

Watch this video all the way through, incredible moves by the Japanese fire rescue teams with their very cooperative casualties.

and then this one

It strikes me that for moving in an urban environment there is perhaps one or two things that can be learned from firefighters, especially the crazy Japanese types with their penchant for (ahem) ropes and knots.

Am sure they wouldn’t be as nimble with combat body armour, a million rounds of ammunition and all the other things infantry soldiers have to carry but it is still an impressive display of technique and fitness.

Henriksen are the market leader in assault ropes and ladder systems for urban and maritime environments, their carbon fibre multi-ladder for example.

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=89u4Fv93rHg

We already conduct ladder training for operations in a built up area, this is relatively common, but it is mostly low rise with very little tunnel or high rise work using combinations of ropes, mechanical ascenders and ladders.

The reality will not be lightweight coveralls and fancy knot work but working with large personal loads and protection equipment, combinations of tempo and safety considerations but I am convinced moving in a complex urban environment, with tunnels, sewers, bridges and multi-storey buildings is a skill we will need to develop across defence as the world increasingly urbanises.

It is not just for the black suited types.

 

 

Are we losing the art of digging?

In the last decade or more of operations in the Middle East, the enemy’s that British forces have faced had not had a great deal of indirect fire capability. Although Iraqi forces in 2003 certainly did have them and used them, they were relatively few in number. In Afghanistan, the majority of indirect fire threat was from mortars and recoilless rifles. To counter, investments in Counter Rockets and Mortars (C-RAM) capability were made; Base-ISTAR, EXACTOR, ground mounts for Phalanx CIWS and lightweight mortar detection radars for example. In addition to the active means of defending fixed locations against sporadic indirect fire, force protection engineering enjoyed a resurgence; HESCO, Defencell and Expeditionary Elevated Sangars for example.

Because operations were conducted from a fewer number of fixed locations they was no need to ‘dig in’.

Against an enemy with decent artillery in a manoeuvre operation things would be different; those familiar with German or even the potential of Russian artillery, when they stopped, they dug.

Whether that was a simple shell scrape, a gun pit, Milan trench with Chatham arch, Mexe Shelter or even using an IPK as something other than a basha, protection from artillery meant digging.

The reason I ask the question is because in all the media released by the MoD of recent exercises covering the ‘return to contingency operations’ theme, I can’t find any that show personnel in a two man trench, a shell scrape or non Hesco based fortification. Many of the UK training areas do not allow digging, for environmental protection and health reasons, unlike Kenya for example.

This doesn’t mean there hasn’t been of course which is why this post is asking a question, is the IPK still on issue, is digging shell scrapes a common occurrence in Battlegroup exercises, which training areas are personnel not allowed to dig in?

For those of a certain age, drink the nostalgia in!

 

 

Munitions Acquisition Supply Solution (MASS)

Whatever happened to the £2b 15 year partnership contract with BAE for small arms and medium calibre ammunition such as mortar bombs and artillery shells, the Munitions Acquisition Supply Solution (MASS)?

 

This was let in 2008 and the certainty of pipeline allowed BAE to invest over £200m and modernise its ammunition production facilities in Radway Green, Glascoed and Birtley after decades of neglect, especially when they were the Royal Ordnance, owned by the MoD. DiD have a good write up on the contract arrangements here

The reason I ask is that a couple of recent contract notes seems to indicate ammunition is being obtained on the open market, outside of the MASS partnering arrangements.

The Authority has a possible future requirement to procure three natures of Armour Piercing Rounds, 5.56 mm, 7.62 mm and 12.7 mm. The minimum estimated quantities for the first year are detailed below:
— 5.56 mm — 76 800;
— 7.62 mm — 16 640;
— 12.7 mm — 15 000.
These Rounds will be for use within training and operational roles with the UK Armed Forces. First Deliveries would be required before the end of 2016. The potential contract will be firm for two years, and the following three years will be classified as Option Years with banded quantities, where deliveries will occur in the April of Years Three through to Five of the contract; exact figures will be provided in the preceding September.

Estimated value £1.5m to £2m

and

The Authority has a possible future requirement to procure 2 separate configurations of Multipurpose (MP) Ammunition:
— 4 MP/1 MPT: 80 000 rounds for 2 financial years,
— 1 MP/1 MPT/1 API: 40 000 rounds for 2 financial years.
All rounds shall be ballistically matched when fired through a 0.5” HMG or M3M.
1. MP — round shall have a AP penetrator, a kinetic HE element and an incendiary element,
2. MPT — round shall have a AP penetrator, a kinetic HE element, an incendiary element and tracer element,
3. API — round shall have AP penetrator and incendiary element.
These rounds will be for use within training and operational roles with the UK Armed Forces.
The requirement would be for up to 10 years, 1st delivery commencing in Autumn 2016. The potential contract will be firm for 2 years with banded options for the following 8 years. For years, 3 to 10 of the contract exact figures against banded option quantities will be provided in the preceding Autumn should the contract extend into the option years.
Should this requirement proceed, a Contract Notice will be published and you will be invited to complete a pre qualification questionnaire, which will be measured against selected criteria in terms of commercial and technical requirements.

Maybe this is normal, maybe the contract requires competitive tendering or at least advertising but they usually indicate where single source arrangements are in place.

This comes on top of another contract advertised last year for 9mm

Interesting.

FN M3M Support Contract

The MoD have issued a contract to FN Herstal SA

Machine guns. The International Guns, Missiles and Rockets team, part of the UK Ministry of Defence, intends to place a 5 year contract (with the option to extend for a further period of 5 years) with FN Herstal S.A. for the provision of in-service support for the m3m machine gun system (the ‘System’) including design custodian services, routine technical support, fault investigation analysis, specialist technical support, modifications, technical publications procurement, procurement of the machine gun system and spares, specialist ad hoc tasking service, repairs and training. The System is the current UK in-service machine gun used on a wide range of rotary wing platforms

How much?

€13m

The M3M is widely used on helicopters and known in the US as the GAU-21. It is a development of the well-known M2 with a greater rate of fire, lower weight and improved accuracy. In addition to the gun itself, the system also includes a ‘soft mount’ and cradle. In comparison to the M2 is fires from an open bolt, has an internal recoil spring and the barrel has a much greater life.

Click here to read more from FN.

 

 

Although the award note says it is mounted on a ‘wide range of rotary wing platforms’ that is correct if one’s definition of wide range is Lynx/Wildcat and Merlin. It would be great to see them fitted to Chinook and Puma and perhaps utilisation in the ground role

An A2 Replacement?

It’s no secret that the A2 has had a hard few years, with prolonged use in Iraq and Afghanistan. It’s also ironic that after many modifications it is now a respected weapon, but one without any real chance of newer versions coming into service due to a lack of the tooling required.

The A1/A2 are what I would class as 1st generation bullpups: that is, rifles that have made it into mass production and have been accepted into service. Other examples include the Steyr Aug and the FAMAS.

One of the problems that this first generation of bullpups had was the inability to fire the weapon left handed. (The Steyr could be set to fire either left or right, but not both.) Although the SA80 was easy for left-handers to adapt (I was one of them!) this often meant that, in built-up areas, the shooter’s body was exposed in situations where it was not possible to fire from cover, i.e. doorways. The only option was to fire an unaimed shot by placing the rifle butt between armpit and chest. Another aspect often commented on is the lack of effective fire due to the calibre used, but for the moment let’s not go there!*

Since the introduction of these first generation systems others have followed, and some have tried to address the left-handed shooting problem. Models intended for military use include the Tavor for Israel, the SAR21 for Singapore and the Croatian VHS-2, which is allegedly under consideration by the French for the FAMAS replacement. There have also been civilian bullpups developed, mainly for the US market, The most notable is the Kel-Tec RFB which uses a forward ejecting system to solve the left/right-hand problem. However, this system had problems with jamming, so Kel-Tec have developed two new models with a downward ejecting system.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vn_LymlQAnc

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-VCOjoY-ruU

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qsFISL339T8

Just recently another ‘bullpup’ system has been announced by a US company, and it’s this one I’m going to take a closer look at. At this point I am not saying that this system is the answer to what should replace the A2. However, I think this has come the closest to answering the questions which have been raised on various forums with regard to calibre and left/right-hand commonality.

DESERT TECH MDR

The Desert Tech MDR is a new system that is still under development and due to go on sale in the US later on in 2015.

 

It uses a forward ejection system, allowing the user to switch from using right to left-hand firing instantly. The ejection system itself can also be switched over to the left-hand side if issued to a “lefty”. So far, nothing to write home about. However, the ace up Desert Tech’s sleeve is that this system can change barrel length and calibre in approximately one minute without re-zeroing. There are videos on YouTube that demonstrate this procedure which can be found below: I will list the time references for the barrel changes. At the time of writing the calibres being used are 5.56mm, 6.80mm, 7.62mm and .308″.

The barrels are 10”, 16” and I think there is a 24”.

What this means IMO, is that a UK infantry section could have one weapon system with options to have a 10” barrel for Close Quarter Battle (CQB) but also a marksman with a longer barrel in 7.62mm as was used in Afghanistan when the L129 was bought in as an Urgent Operational Requirement (UOR). The video shows the demonstrator changing barrel and bolt in around 45 secs, obviously the carbine version could be used for AFV and air crew with the option to carry a longer barrel to adapt to various situations.

The video features the barrel change at 06:20. (It was whilst watching this video that I got the urge to write this article.) At around the 08:00 minute mark the guy manning the stall starts to explain about the mods to the company’s bullpup sniper system. This can also permit rapid barrel changes. He shows the rifle with a short barrel, with an overall length of 26”(less with that new folding stock). To me this means that a sniper could move around without having to a have a secondary weapon system, or even jump in with the weapon ready to fire. I have added a second video showing a demonstration of the weapon hitting targets at 1000 yards straight after a barrel change! (Barrel change is shown at 04:00.)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QSuaMf4Q_Y0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gbCgjAsuq9k

To summarise, I am not saying the British Army should rush out and buy 10,000 units right now!

However, the Desert Tech system does seem to answer many frequently raised points about barrel lengths and calibres.

Also, as this weapon is still undergoing final tests, there’s a chance of getting in early and possibly getting a licence-to-build contract and, therefore, maybe a return to manufacturing weapons in the UK again! (Stop laughing at the back!) I’ve only included the two videos shown here as many of the public domain material is for the benefit of US civilian gun enthusiasts, rather than for the military perspective. However, there are videos of the weapon being fired and there are several on the sniper rifle variant. While the A2 still has service life left, it would be possible to carry out trials on the Desert Tech MDR and, if successful, sort out a manufacturing process and then copy the A1 roll-out strategy. That is to say, frontline line “teeth” arms receiving it first with other arms to follow. (I wasn’t issued the A1 until 1992 when I was in 7 brigade, 18 months after the infantry across the road!)

 

*The calibre debate is a huge subject, not for this short post

The AirTEP

The Tactical Extraction Platform from Escape International in France is designed to carry up to 10 personnel, providing facilities for them to be rapidly extracted. It has found some success with rescue organisations, especially those involved with forest fire fighting.

Made of aluminium, stainless steel and kevlar reinforced webbing it weighs in at just under 7o kg’s and can be used up to 100kph to extact personnel from rooftops, ships and other constrained locations.

It has also been used to extract divers from open water and inserting tactical teams quickly.

Watch the videos…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wiiSXhr2Mkc

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PvXOfu1Iu0Q

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VuzOm9lMDKw

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2PavPOGm4Ac

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YHQiE0ThLMs

 

60mm Mortar

In 2013 Janes reported that the Hirtenberger 60mm mortar purchased under an Urgent Operational Requirement would only be retained for RM/PARA use and the rest would be withdrawn. (read the Hirtenberger datasheet here)

A picture last week from the MoD shows one in action during a training exercise

They look quite large, and heavy.

https://www.flickr.com/photos/73614187@N03/6647943705/

Compare to the old 51mm (2″) mortar.

The French/German Fly-K system (Lance Grenade Individuel in French service) always looked a more natural replacement, now we are best friends with the French perhaps they will let us try some of their Fly-K’s as well as artillery and armoured vehicles?

Did we include the Fly-K in evaluation for the 60mm?

Would be interesting to see the trade off’s and a comparison between the 40mm UGL, Fly-K, the 60mm and even (whisper it) rifle grenades!

60mm is a standard calibre and in widespread use so there are plenty of natures available, the Fly-K on the other hand is only in use with France and the UAE. The protection module looks interesting and the visual and acoustic signature is very low.

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lb1WNkxB_eE